|
State of Wisconsin |
HISTORY |
The policy on this page is from a previous version of the handbook.
Changes can be reported timely or untimely. Agency workers must act promptly on all reported changes. If verification is requested, a minimum of 20 days must be allowed for the member to provide the verification.
7 CFR 273.12(c)(1) waiver
Following the report of a change, request verification from the member as soon as possible (see Section 1.2.1 Verification Introduction). To prevent “failure to act” agency QC errors, agency workers must act on reported changes within 10 days. As a best practice a worker should process the change as soon as possible and not wait until the 10th day.
| Example 1 | On June 19, Barry reported having a new job that started on June 9. The IM worker must request verification and allow Barry 20 days to provide it. If verification is requested on June 19, it will be due July 9. The IM worker will have time to process the verification and issue proper notice to Barry by adverse action in July. If the IM worker fails to act on the change by not requesting verification until June 30, Barry would have until July 20 to provide the verification, which is after adverse action. In this case, it is possible that August benefits would be in error due to IM worker failure to act promptly on the reported change. |
Lack of verification is a common cause of case closure. A new application for FoodShare is not always required under specific circumstances when FoodShare closes due to lack of verification during the certification period. Allow FoodShare to reopen without a new application when closing for lack of verification after a change is reported or discovered during the certification period, as long as the requested verification is submitted in the calendar month following case closure. Benefits are prorated from the date the required action was taken.
| Example 2 | Julie is certified for FoodShare from March through February. Julie calls and reports a new job on April 5. Julie’s IM agency requests verification of Julie’s employment, due April 25. Julie fails to provide verification by the due date and FoodShare closes effective May 30. Julie provides the required verification on June 8. Julie’s FoodShare case reopens without requiring a new FoodShare application and prorates benefits from June 8 forward. Julie’s certification period remains the same March through February. |
FoodShare may also close for reasons other than lack of verification. Allow FoodShare to reopen when a change in circumstances causes the FoodShare assistance group to regain eligibility during the month following the month of case closure, as long as the food unit takes the required action.
FoodShare members may choose to reapply for benefits in the month following closure even when not required. Completing a new application establishes a new filing date, allowing the member up to 30 days to provide needed verification. IM workers should explain the difference between completing a new application and providing needed information to members when possible.
| Example 3 | Pam’s FoodShare closes effective September 30 due to a pay increase at her job. Pam contacts the IM agency on October 8 to reapply for FoodShare. Pam reports a decrease in income due to a reduction in work hours. The IM agency informs Pam of the option to reapply for FoodShare or to provide verification reflective of the current circumstances to reopen FoodShare effective the date the verification is provided, as long as Pam meets program criteria. Pam chooses to provide verification and submits it on October 12. Pam’s FoodShare reopens with prorated benefits from October 12 forward. |
| Example 4 | Joan’s FoodShare closes effective October 31 as a result of a newly added roommate’s earned income. Joan contacts the IM agency on November 19 because the roommate moved out and Joan wants to reapply for FoodShare. The IM agency provides Joan the option of reapplying for FoodShare or reopening her FoodShare effective November 19. Joan chooses to reopen FoodShare without a new application. The IM agency removes the roommate from the case and re-determines a prospective estimate of Joan’s income and expenses. FoodShare benefits are issued from November 19 forward. |
7 CFR 273.2(f)(9)
Some examples of changes considered to be "verified on receipt" are:
7 CFR 273.12(c)(1)
FNS Memo 12/18/14
All reported changes that cause an increase in the FoodShare benefit including person additions, increases in expenses, etc., will be effective the first of the month following the report month if required verifications are received within 20 days of the request for verification.
If needed verifications are not received within 20 days, and the FoodShare case is not closed for at least one day, make the change effective the first of the month following the month verifications are received.
Issue the appropriate supplement by the 10th day of the month the increase in benefits is effective.
| Note | A person can be a member of more than one food unit but only one assistance group in the same month except residents of shelters for victims of domestic violence (see Section 3.4.1 Dual Membership and Duplicate Benefits). Prior to adding a person from one FoodShare case to another, remove the person from the previous FoodShare case. |
| Example 5 |
If Mike (a baby) is born June 25, and the change is reported June 27, FoodShare benefits increase effective July 1. Since the case was reported after adverse action, a FoodShare supplement is issued for July. If Mike (a baby) is born June 25, and the change is reported July 1, FoodShare benefits will increase effective August 1. No FoodShare supplement is issued. |
| Example 6 | Jule has an open FoodShare case with a certification period of February through January. Jule reports on March 25 that Eve, Jule's sister, moved in on March 15 and they purchase and prepare together. Jule’s IM worker requests verification of Eve’s eligibility information by April 14. Verification is not provided by April 4 and the FoodShare case closes effective April 30. Eve provides verification to the local agency on May 15. FoodShare reopened without a new application. Eve is added to the assistance group and benefits are redetermined and prorated for the month of May. In June, Jule and Eve will receive a full month of benefits. Jule’s FoodShare certification period remains the same, February through January. |
| Example 7 | Lisa reports on March 5 that her husband left the home on February 27. Lisa's husband was working, and this change results in Lisa being eligible for more FoodShare benefits. The IM worker re-determines the prospective estimate of Lisa’s income for the next benefit month, April, and confirms benefits. Since the change was processed March 5, before adverse action, no supplement is needed. |
| Example 8 | Carol reports on March 25 that rent is increasing by $500 for April. The IM worker finds the expense questionable, as Carol's current rent expense is $300 and the rent increase more than doubles the total rent expense. The case is pended on March 25 and verification is due April 15. Carol provided the verification on April 3. On April 5, the IM worker makes the change to increase Carol’s FoodShare benefit effective April 1 and issues a supplement for April. If Carol had reported the rent increase on April 2, or provided the verification after April 15, the FoodShare benefit increase would have been effective May 1. |
An IM worker should act on a sanction request immediately but has 10 days to process the request. However, the IM worker should try to enter the sanction before the next adverse action (see Section 6.3.1 Negative Notices) in CARES.
| Example 9 | The IM worker receives a sanction request for Jayne on June 12. The IM worker officially has 10 days to process the sanction. Adverse action is on June 18, the worker makes sure to act on the sanction before the 18th. However, if they do not, the case would not be in error unless the worker did not act on the sanction until after adverse action in July. |
If an individual is requesting to be added to the FoodShare assistance group following:
Eligibility for the previously excluded person will be effective the first of the month following the period of disqualification, or the first of the month following their request to be added back to the FoodShare assistance group, whichever is later.
| Example 10 |
Margaret’s husband David is sanctioned from September 1 through August 31 due to an IPV. Margaret calls on August 25 and requests that David be added back to the FoodShare assistance group on September 1. Verification is complete. The IM worker adds David to the group effective September 1. If Margaret’s request for David to be added back to the group was made on or after September 1, he would be added to the group effective the first of the month following the request. |
7 CFR 273.12(c)(2)(i)
For reported changes that result in a decrease in benefits, process the change to allow for adequate negative notice to be issued to the member. If verifications are not received within 20 days, and the FoodShare case is not closed for at least one day, make the change effective the first of the month following the month verifications are received.
| Example 11 |
Lisa reports on June 3 that her husband moved back into the home on May 29. On June 3, Lisa’s IM worker adds Roy to the FoodShare case and requests verification of his income due June 23. Roy’s income will cause a decrease in FoodShare benefits. Lisa provides Roy’s verification on June 10. Notice of a decrease in benefits is issued at adverse action in June and benefits are decreased for July. If verification was not provided by the due date, the IM agency would take action to close the FoodShare case for lack of verification. Since the due date and agency action to close the case occurs after adverse action in June. FoodShare benefits would close July 31 for failure to verify income. |
Use the Change Impact Matrix to determine how to respond to changes reported by food units.
| Food Unit Type | Initial Certification Period | Initial SMRF Requirement | Change Reported | Date Change Acted On | Impact on Certification Period | SMRF Requirement after Change |
|
Regular |
12 months |
Yes |
Homelessness or Migrant in household |
Prior to adverse action in the fourth month |
Certification period of six months requiring a review in month six to continue eligibility |
No |
|
After adverse action in the fourth month |
No effect on the original certification period of 12 months |
Yes |
||||
|
Homeless or Migrant |
6 months |
No |
Reports securing housing or no longer migrant |
Prior to adverse action in the fourth month |
Certification period of 12 months |
Yes |
|
After adverse action in the fourth month |
Certification period remains four months |
No |
||||
|
EBD household with earnings |
12 months |
Yes |
Source of earnings ends |
At any time |
No effect |
No |
|
EBD without earnings |
12 months |
No |
New source of earnings |
Prior to adverse action in the fourth month |
No effect |
Yes |
|
After adverse action in the fourth month |
No |
|||||
|
TFS |
5 months |
No |
Change in income, household comp, or other types of change |
At any time |
No effect |
No |
|
Death of PP or when PP moves out of Wisconsin |
TFS closes and member must re-apply |
N/A |
When an exemption is reported and verified, workers must apply an exemption on the first of the month in which the exemption began, regardless of when the exemption is reported or whether it is verified timely (see Section 3.17.1.4 Verification of Work Hours and Exemptions From FoodShare Work Requirement).
The FoodShare Clock Page may need to be adjusted once verification of an exemption is provided (see SECTION 3.17.1.12 ADJUSTING FOODSHARE CLOCK PAGE).
This page last updated in Release Number: 23-01
Release Date: 04/17/2023
Effective Date: 04/17/2023
Notice: The content within this manual is the sole responsibility of the State of Wisconsin's Department of Health Services (DHS). This site will link to sites outside of DHS where appropriate. DHS is in no way responsible for the content of sites outside of DHS.
Publication Number: P-16001